Chumbawamba got it right, didn't they?
It was so good, even better than I'd expected, to see them again on the recent BBC Four repeats of 'Top of the Pops' episodes from August 1997. 'Tubthumping' is one of those songs that's so familiar it's easy to take it completely for granted. But Chumbawamba's two performances on the show were pure joy. There's the one where they're all clad in black and another where the line-up are dressed immaculately in distinctly non-anarcho white, apart from vocalist Dunstan in a mad brick wall pattern suit. In both, the studio's teenybop audience go wild.
There's loads I could write about Chumbawamba but others can do it so much better and I don't feel I could do the band justice, so I'm here just because I'm bursting with a newly energised appreciation of them all these years later. And because something in my head is going: this is what anarcho-punk should have been like all along.
I suggest this only from my own perspective and experience, but I think it'd be fair to say that there are some things that Mr SDS regrets about his time in another anarcho-punk band, perhaps the main thing being the lack of... fun. The same goes for me, being immersed in it at the time too. I still think it's great that the bands (and followers) were fired up and angry enough to express and promote beliefs, support countless under-represented people and causes, etc. and what better time than in your youth when you have all that energy and the genuine conviction that you can change things through music, through coming together, spreading the word and so on. But I don't think there was enough light to help offset the justified yet depressing darkness in this particular genre. Black clothes became - rather ironically - a soulless uniform, after-gig conversations often continued political debates with little humour; there wasn't much frivolous relief. And that's not to mention a degree of the "I'm more earnest than you" self-righteousness and judgement within its ranks too.
There's also the glaringly obvious fact that most bands by their very nature were only appealing to a few, a minority who wanted their music loud, shouty, angry, dischordant or whatever. Music that reflected the seriousness of the lyrics, music that your parents wouldn't like. Thus there was a continual loop of preaching to the converted, and everything staying within its own parameters: underground.
But then you get Chumbawamba. Upbeat, musically diverse and genuinely talented and melodic - they actually smile, they dance, they make you... feel good? Is that ok, to feel good? It doesn't mean you don't still care. For a while in anarcho's most intense period during the '80s, it seemed it just wasn't ok to enjoy yourself. Whilst maybe I shouldn't compare Chumbawamba's success in 'Tubthumping' with the anarcho scene from around 15 years earlier, I wonder if it still serves as a valid example of what could have been?
Chumbawamba had been a big part of the '80s anarcho punk movement, playing numerous benefit gigs and writing songs about the miners' strikes, homophobia, etc. but it was their signing to EMI in 1997 which perhaps caused the most controversy. Did they 'sell out" or did they do exactly the right thing by accepting an offer that would propel them into the charts and give them access to hundreds of thousands more listeners and potential converts around the world? They argued that, in a capitalist environment, almost every record company operated around capitalist principles - even smaller ones were motivated by profit - so the move to a major label brought them much bigger exposure plus the funds to do more. Soon after, 'Tubthumping', with its singalong chorus (and prolific use of the word 'pissing'!) hit the charts, and I remember thinking at the time, "whaaat? An anarcho punk band on the BBC?!"
Watching them again on the repeats though, I'm so charmed and impressed by everything about them. They really look like they're having... fun. Smiles! Dancing! Loudhailers! A trumpet break!
I think guitarist Boff Whalley puts it really well in an interview with the Guardian from 2016. "To 99% of people we just had that one song, but there is always the 1% who listen to the rest of the album and like it enough to listen to more. I still really like 'Tubthumping'. I don't feel embarrassed by it at all. I know some bands who hate their songs being popular, but I just think, 'Get off your high horse!' The whole point of art is to have an audience."
Vocalist Dunstan Bruce adds, "I never gave a shit about people saying we had sold out. It was much more important to be part of popular culture as a political band. We gave a lot of the money away and it was a real opportunity to do something positive."
So positive that it unexpectedly made my day to see these two performances again... I hope it does yours.
It makes me smile that Alice can't sing the P on pissing... or can't mime it, if they weren't playing live.
ReplyDeleteI reckon fun should be an integral part of even the darkest band. Look at The Cure or The Smiths, often derided for miserablism, yet they both have a lot of humour in their lyrics or upbeat tunes to balance the misery.
It makes me smile too just to think of them getting away with it being in the lyrics at all!
DeleteYes, surely the fun bit should be integral. There are so many other things in life that aren't - going to a gig or being in a band really oughtn't be one of them.
I'm with you and Rol; there's fun to be had, even in dark corners.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, and t's all the more vital in those dark corners!
DeleteIt must be a prerequisite of forming/joining a band. Mustn't it?
ReplyDeleteJM
One would think so!
Delete