And all because he played in an anarcho-punk band, one which
was closely associated with Crass and who expressed some strong left-wing
political views as well as being into pacifism, nuclear disarmament and
anti-vivisection, that kind of thing.
I was thinking about this after looking at this rather eye-opening piece in Tuesday’s Guardian (with many thanks to the person who sent it to me!) It's a fascinating glimpse into something that was really quite sinister. In
East Germany in the ‘80s, being a punk must have required far more bravery and
resilience than over here. Disapproving looks, name-calling and being refused entry to unfamiliar pubs was the norm
for many of us who looked a little alternative in our youth, but it’s hard to imagine
being automatically pulled in for questioning (or worse) by the authorities,
not because you were actively protesting or involved in threatening behaviour
at the time but simply because you sported an image that represented your musical
taste and possible associated beliefs. It’s worrying to think that dressing a
certain way could be treated almost as a criminal act in itself; I can’t help
but admire the young subjects of these old photos.
Things could still happen, however, when you were in a British
anarcho-punk band who proclaimed their political opinions during the Thatcher
years, and I asked Mr SDS to remind me of one particular incident.
It was 1982, and the band members were going to take some
photos for their forthcoming album in a secluded spot in the countryside. Not just any old place though; this was an
area they had specifically chosen for its proximity to the site of a ‘secret’ nuclear
bunker, a sophisticated fallout shelter designed to accommodate the Government
in the event of such a catastrophic war.
Apparently the shelter itself, which had been paid for with public
money, was a deep underground complex with blast-proof doors and was capable
of holding up to 600 people. (Oh, imagine – all those politicians and their
associates becoming breeding stock for a whole new post-apocalypse world!)
Anyway, maybe choosing somewhere so close to this sensitive
location was asking for trouble but still they were surprised when, as soon as
they’d started setting up their backdrops and banners to photograph, a man
appeared seemingly out of nowhere to confront them. He was
pretty aggressive. “We don’t need CND yellow-bellies like you around” he told
them, amongst other things, and ordered them to pack up their stuff and leave.
After a brief discussion they returned to their car, the man
following them for a short distance before turning off. They thought
that was the end of the matter but within minutes, again apparently out of
nowhere, a police car had started tailing them. Mr SDS said it seemed strange how quickly it appeared and they just thought it must be coincidence at first, but no, next thing you know they were being pulled over. From then they were
questioned and their vehicle thoroughly searched. The officers had them unfurl all their backdrops for examination and
even confiscated the photographic film – then took notes on their personal
details and physical appearance on the spot. Indeed Mr SDS was even
quizzed about that striking hair: “Is this your natural colour?”
When they were finally allowed to continue on their way with
nothing to actually incriminate them,
they were offered a stern warning, or was it more of a threat?
"WATCH OUT IN FUTURE".
"WATCH OUT IN FUTURE".
It seems no coincidence that shortly after this incident some of the band members' post was delivered to them, already opened... Who knows what other surveillance was going on? I have to wonder too what happened to those files!
Have you ever had a brush with the law for your political beliefs, or even the way you looked? I'd love to hear.
Have you ever had a brush with the law for your political beliefs, or even the way you looked? I'd love to hear.
No! Guess I was always a bit too conventional to attract such attention, outwardly at least.
ReplyDeleteAh, but were you just undercover....?!
DeleteI think it felt even more intimidating then too, given the context of the time. Plus these days I think we're more aware of surveillance methods and also our rights, we're used to CCTV, internet tracking and Data Protection, instant connections via mobile phone, dashcams, etc. Then it all seemed more covert, more sinister.
Fascinating post, C. Of course, such things 'seem' like ancient history but I am certain it still goes on and if not on the same scale as back in Margaret's time then I am sure Boris and Jeremy will be planning to bring it all back after the forthcoming election. I, too, was a yellow-bellied CND type (plus some Animal rights type action and Labour Party membership) during the same era but I thankfully escaped the notice of the the powers that be. This was possibly to do with the fact that I tended to dress pretty conservatively and apart from lots of local activity and collecting for the miners I did keep my nose pretty clean (this was probably due to a mixture of cowardice and laziness). Many of my associates in the Labour Movement did swear they were either being harassed in some nebulous way by MI5 or 6 and certainly had their phones tapped. I was never sure if this was true as I think left wingers did like to hope they were important enough to be noticed by the dark powers. They were funny times, for sure. Things aren't any better now but somehow more complicated and, perhaps, even more sinister, I think. It would be interesting to see how long it would take 'them' to dust off Mr. SDS's files if he were to be a bit 'naughty'. This is NOT a recommendation!
ReplyDeleteThanks Rickety Rackety and lovely to see you here! I totally get what you're saying - it was a time when if you were CND / Animal Rights / Labour etc. there was a lot going on and you didn't have to be outwardly obvious to be involved. I remember that my mum, and even found out later that my grandparents on my dad's side too, supported CND and were involved in things on a local level.
DeleteDo you think now that it feels now as if everything is a little more fractured, there are even more issues, even more variances and strands, that it seemed more black-and-white then?
I'm sure any old file on Mr SDS, apart from being out-of-date, would be rather amusing to see, but hopefully it was chucked out during a routine spring clean some time in the '90s!
Yes, things are certainly more fractured now and I think the 'dark forces' have upped their level of sophistication so those they do want to keep tabs on may not necessarily be so aware of it. As far as 'causes' are concerned everything is all over the place and I, for one, never really know who's speaking nay kind of truth or sense any more. Lovely to be back commenting, BTW, and shall endeavour to keep up more. I am making an attempt at a new thing...nearly all just random photos I take on my travels...https://keep-it-with-mine.blogspot.com/ so if you fancy having a look you will be most welcome. Nonee of my former places exist any longer but I am hoping this might be nice for others to look at and help bring peace to the troubled soul.
DeleteGreat post C. As you say above we're probably increasingly surveilled by CCTV etc but the personal, face to face harassment may have been stepped down a bit. Another irony is that some of the secret nuclear bunkers are now open as Cold War tourist attractions.
ReplyDeleteThanks SA. I found that article in the Guardian very thought-provoking because the subjects in the photos just looked so familiar. Indeed the face-to-face harassment doesn't seem so prevalent and probably doesn't need to be seeing as so many willingly enter into activities that are surveilled online. So, if you're reading this....!
DeleteSo bizarre about the bunker tourist attractions! I feel I ought to visit one.
I’ve visited Scotland’s Secret Bunker near Anstruther in Fife.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting if surreal experience
I can imagine how surreal! I watched Rich Hall's 'The Red Menace' documentary last night and was stunned by the deluxe fallout shelter in Nevada that he visited. Crazy times.
DeleteAbsolutely fascinating stuff, C.
ReplyDeleteAs for run ins with the law, in my younger days I has plenty, but sadly not for anything as morally sound as my political views!
Thanks Jez, and nice to see you here. Why am I not totally surprised by your admission here?! ;-)
DeleteWhat a fascinating post C and with the passage of time it now seems bizarre that the crime of being a pacifist and pro-nuclear disarmament could get you black-listed. Throughout the '80s I lived in Oil Capital of Europe, Aberdeen, and I now realise we were living in a bit of an affluent bubble so unlike other parts of the country where so much protest and unrest was happening.
ReplyDeleteLove your observation that "all those 600 politicians and their associates would become the breeding stock for a whole new post-apocalypse world!". A scary thought.
Thanks Alyson and yes, as you so rightly say, it was "the crime of being a pacifist and pro-nuclear disarmament". Things felt so heavy for a while, certainly down here not so far from London. I hadn't really appreciated that bubble-like existence elsewhere that you describe.
DeleteImagine Thatcher's cohorts heading up a whole new generation, ugh... but then they would eventually have had to go above ground to scrabble round in the radioactive remains, so it's not all bad ;-)
Hope I don't get a file started on me for saying that now.
Frightening. I can see us returning to that kind of state though, the way things are going... perhaps without hair colour being a cause for suspicion though. So that, at least, must signify progress.
ReplyDeleteYeah I think things are just as frightening in a different way. I guess it's just the way of the world, and the fucked-up-ness of the human race. Watching Rich Hall's documentary The Red Menace reminded and educated me on all the nuclear near-misses from 50-odd years ago too... it's a wonder we've got this far.
Delete